Gipsies Essays - DraftBuenas Pintas, DraftMarcelo Barg

Gipsies El documental Memoria gitana. Guerra Civil y dictadura en Euskal Herria, dirigido por Jess Mara Palacio, recupera la historia y los testimonios de los gitanos vascos tras el golpe de 1936, la posterior guerra y la represin. El reportaje fue presentado el pasado mircoles en Donostia en un acto al que acudieron Rafael Jimnez, de la Asociacin Gitana por el Futuro de Gipuzkoa (Agifugi); Marcos Nanclares, director foral de Migracin y Diversidad; y Naiara Sampedro, concejala donostiarra de Diversidad. Tanto la Diputacin como el Ayuntamiento de la capital han colaborado econmicamente en este proyecto. La idea naci en 2002, cuando Agifugi trataba de recuperar informacin sobre la persecucin de gitanos durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial para incluirla en su cmic Miguel y Nekane, donde cuentan la historia de este pueblo en un formato ms atractivo para los jvenes. La falta de documentacin institucional sobre los gitanos y la cultura oral y grafa caracterstica de este pueblo llev a los productores a recoger numerosos testimonios tanto de gitanos exiliados como de los represaliados por el franquismo, los cuales se han visto plasmada en el documental. La historia de las minoras pocas veces se ensea en los colegios y las universidades, por eso la asociacin decidi ponerse manos a la obra para arrojar un poco de luz sobre uno de los episodios ms oscuros y tenebrosos de la historia de los gitanos, ha comentado Jimnez. Durante 30 minutos, la crnica intercala testimonios con imgenes de diversos pasajes de la guerra. El documental huye de los tpicos culturales y el victimismo porque, segn Nanclares, esto provoca un efecto contrario. Al ser producido con dinero pblico el documental tiene derechos de libre acceso y estar disponible en las casas de cultura de Donostia, anunci el representante de Agifugi, quien no descart presentarlo al Festival de Cine y Derechos Humanos que se celebra cada ao en la capital guipuzcoana. En principio, su presentacin pblica ser el 15 de octubre en el Teatro Principal de Donostia y podr visionarse tambin a travs de la pgina web de la asociacin.

Women sport

Women sport Women SportWomen have always been treated unequally in comparison to males in our society. In the past, women were extremely restricted with their rights by not having equal opportunity in the job force, education, and their overall social life. They were expected to follow the norms and guidelines society had put upon them. If they did not abide by these guidelines, uproar would arise in the community. One major activity that caused uproar in the community was when women began participating in sports. Sports began during the Native American times where women were expected to stay home and take care of the children, while men were able to have leisure time and enjoy their life by playing sports. As years continued, women began thinking about their abilities and talent to play a sport. Once they started participating in sports, much controversy arose. Although controversy arose, they still continued to play to portray their strength and confidence as women.Gender Equality Architecture ReformThey violated society's norms hoping that one day there will be a professional female athlete to represent the oppressed women who were told that they had no right playing sports.The rise of first, second, and third wave feminism was an important issue in the growth of women athletes. First wave feminism is a very old form of feminism. They did not believe in individualism as much as the second and third wave feminists believed. Second wave feminists branched from first wave feminists, but second wave feminists fought harder for gender equality. As third wave feminism arose, more changes took place with women and their rights. Third wave feminism is the newest form of feminism. Third wave feminists are women in today's society at the age of twenty or thirty who focus on recent and general topics of feminism. These feminists...

MicroL20 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

MicroL20 - Essay Example b. An example of a good with a positive externality is occupied housing. Certainly, the individuals housed benefit from shelter, security, and an ability to organize their lives and families in a way that would not likely be feasible if they were homeless. Owners enjoy rents (implicit if the property is owner-occupied) on the home. These are primarily private benefits. Occupied housing tends to be better maintained, improving neighborhood property values) over the long term and neighborhoods with higher occupancy rates tend to have lower crime rates. Both of these are primarily public benefits. An example of a good with a negative externality is a car with an extremely loud stereo system. While the audiophile-owner may enjoy the experience (a private benefit), those who are forced to experience the sound against their will are faced with a nuisance (a public cost). 2. Monopolies. a. If Bart charges $15, then he sells a meal for a total profit of $10. If he charges $8, he'll sell two meals for a total profit of $6. If he charges $7, he'll sell three meals at a total profit of $6. It's in Bart's best interest to charge $15.00 and sell a single meal. The producer surplus in this case is $10 and there is no consumer surplus. b. Without advanced knowledge of who would be willing to pay which price, it would be difficult for him to price discriminate, but there are some strategies he might pursue. One is to institute â€Å"haggling.† If every transaction is negotiated, it is possible that those willing to pay a higher price might be persuaded to part with more cash for the same meal than a less well-funded customer (though this increases transaction costs). It might also be possible for Bart to create categories of customers, through some sort of discounting mechanism, which would make it more likely that those willing to pay more would spend more. He might create three cosmetically different, though essentially similar, meals (though this pushes the boundarie s of the premise, since the meals would no longer be the same). Ideally, he would be able to sell three meals, one each for $15, $8 and $7. In reality, with imperfect information, he'd likely not do this well. c. Bart would be able to sell three meals, one each for $15, $8 and $7. The producer surplus will be $15 and there will be no consumer surplus. d. If all three meals were purchased by one person, it would be difficult for Brad to price discriminate, except, perhaps, by the use of discount cards or some similar device that needed to be presented upon ordering or paying. Assuming he could not price discriminate and the consumers presented a united, three meals or nothing front, we would expect three meals sold at $7 each. e. If there were another restaurant in town, it would be much more difficult for Bart to price discriminate. He would need to depend on factors such as market friction, customer loyalty or location preference (i.e., Bart's restaurant is easier to get to) or col lusion with his competitor to maintain some degree of monopoly power if he wanted to continue to price discriminate. As the number of competitors increased the situation would increasingly resemble a perfect competition model and Bart would become a price taker. f. It would be very difficult to effectively price discriminate